Radeon RX 6800M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.84
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 May 2020 (5 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed300 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2390 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60382.4
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.1.971.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 145 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has 866.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and Radeon RX 6800M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 74 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 337 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.