Quadro FX 1700 vs ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.94
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR360G84
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)12 September 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed412 MHz460 MHz
Number of transistors117 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data42 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2967.360
Floating-point processing powerno data0.05888 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs816
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed344 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.02 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

FX 1700 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9800 X2-256T and Quadro FX 1700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T
FireGL 9800 X2-256T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9800 X2-256T or Quadro FX 1700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.