Quadro FX 1400 vs ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.41
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameR360NV41
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)9 August 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed412 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors117 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2964.200
ROPs88
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed344 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.02 GB/s19.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 9 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FX 1400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9800 X2-256T and Quadro FX 1400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T
FireGL 9800 X2-256T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
Quadro FX 1400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 35 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9800 X2-256T or Quadro FX 1400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.