ATI Radeon X1600 PRO vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameR300RV530
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)1 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed324 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors110 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate2.5922.000
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed276 MHz390 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.66 GB/s12.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 41 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p has 11% lower power consumption.

ATI X1600 PRO, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and Radeon X1600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1600 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 133 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256p or Radeon X1600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.