ATI Radeon X1650 XT AGP vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameR300RV560
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (24 years ago)30 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed324 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors110 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate2.5924.320
ROPs88
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed276 MHz680 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.66 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 30 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 55 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p has 49% lower power consumption.

ATI X1650 XT AGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and Radeon X1650 XT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 XT AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256p or Radeon X1650 XT AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.