RTX A3000 Mobile vs Extreme Graphics 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.28
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMontaraGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 December 2003 (22 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed266 MHz1230 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate0.27157.4
Floating-point processing powerno data10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data264.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2003 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

RTX A3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics 2 and RTX A3000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Extreme Graphics 2 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 201 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics 2 or RTX A3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.