GeForce 7200 GS vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16191557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRS200G72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)18 January 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2no data
Core clock speed183 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHzno data
Number of transistors30 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm90 nm
Texture fill rate0.371.800
ROPs22
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared334 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.344 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.42.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4
7200 GS 23
+1050%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Palworld 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Palworld 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 18 January 2006
Chip lithography 180 nm 90 nm

7200 GS has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce 7200 GS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7200 GS is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 87 votes

Rate GeForce 7200 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or GeForce 7200 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.