Radeon PRO W7800 vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated28
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.34
Power efficiencyno data19.48
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code namePonte VecchioNavi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 January 2023 (3 years ago)13 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71684480
Core clock speed1000 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate694.4707.0
Floating-point processing power22.22 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUs448280
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores5670
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache28 MB2 MB
L2 Cache204 MB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB32 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2023 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 260 Watt

Data Center GPU Max 1100 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max 1100 and Radeon PRO W7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Data Center GPU Max 1100 or Radeon PRO W7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.