ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code namePonte VecchioR350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 January 2023 (3 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7168no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHzno data
Number of transistors100,000 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate694.43.040
Floating-point processing power22.22 TFLOPSno data
ROPsno data8
TMUs4488
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores56no data
L1 Cache28 MBno data
L2 Cache204 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR
Maximum RAM amount48 GB128 MB
Memory bus width8192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2023 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 47 Watt

Data Center GPU Max 1100 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 538.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max 1100 and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Data Center GPU Max 1100
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Data Center GPU Max 1100 or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.