Radeon RX 6800M vs CMP 40HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared CMP 40HX with Radeon RX 6800M, including specs and performance data.

CMP 40HX
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 185 Watt
22.15

RX 6800M outperforms CMP 40HX by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.76no data
Power efficiency9.1216.65
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2021 (4 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1470 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2390 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate237.6382.4
Floating-point processing power7.603 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144160
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

CMP 40HX 22.15
RX 6800M 31.69
+43.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

CMP 40HX 9283
RX 6800M 13280
+43.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−52.9%
107
+52.9%
1440p45−50
−57.8%
71
+57.8%
4K30−35
−43.3%
43
+43.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.99no data
1440p15.53no data
4K23.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+0%
123
+0%
Sons of the Forest 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Sons of the Forest 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Sons of the Forest 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Sons of the Forest 53
+0%
53
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+0%
84
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Sons of the Forest 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Sons of the Forest 40
+0%
40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how CMP 40HX and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 58% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 43% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.15 31.69
Recency 25 February 2021 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 145 Watt

RX 6800M has a 43.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 27.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 40HX in performance tests.

Be aware that CMP 40HX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 58 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 334 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 40HX or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.