Arc A770 vs CMP 40HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX CMP 40HX CMP 50HX CMP 70HX CMP 90HX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7 A770M Arc 7 A780 Arc A580 Arc A750 Arc A770 Arc A780

Aggregate performance score

We've compared CMP 40HX with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

CMP 40HX
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 185 Watt
21.32

Arc A770 outperforms CMP 40HX by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking263154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.4955.87
Power efficiency8.0310.47
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU106DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 February 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A770 has 111% better value for money than CMP 40HX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044096
Core clock speed1470 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate237.6614.4
Floating-point processing power7.603 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs144256
Tensor Cores288512
Ray Tracing Cores3632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

CMP 40HX 21.32
Arc A770 33.81
+58.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

CMP 40HX 8301
Arc A770 13166
+58.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−70.8%
111
+70.8%
1440p35−40
−77.1%
62
+77.1%
4K24−27
−66.7%
40
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.75
−263%
2.96
+263%
1440p19.97
−276%
5.31
+276%
4K29.13
−254%
8.23
+254%
  • Arc A770 has 263% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 276% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 254% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+0%
132
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+0%
99
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how CMP 40HX and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 71% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 77% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.32 33.81
Recency 25 February 2021 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 225 Watt

CMP 40HX has 21.6% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 58.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 40HX in performance tests.

Be aware that CMP 40HX is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
Apple M1 7-Core GPU Apple 7 Core GPU
vs
Jetson Orin NX 8 GB NX 8 GB
Playstation 4 Slim GPU AMD 4 Slim GPU
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
RX 7900 XT 7900 XT
R9 M390 Mac Edition AMD R9 M390 Mac Edition
vs
RX 7900 XT 7900 XT
RX 6600 XT AMD RX 6600 XT
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Graphics 80EU
RX 7900 GRE 7900 GRE
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q
A16 PCIe A16 PCIe
vs
H100 PCIe 96 GB 96 GB
A40 PCIe A40 PCIe
vs
RX 6750 GRE 6750 GRE
PG506-232 PG506 232
vs
RTX 4080 SUPER 4080 SUPER
T400 Mobile Quadro T400 Mobile
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU Pro GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 56 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5380 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 40HX or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.