Radeon PRO V710 vs CMP 30HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared CMP 30HX and Radeon PRO V710, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

CMP 30HX
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
17.11

PRO V710 outperforms CMP 30HX by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking343182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.40no data
Power efficiency9.7414.85
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 February 2021 (4 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14083456
Core clock speed1530 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate157.1432.0
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs88216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB28 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

CMP 30HX 17.11
PRO V710 33.00
+92.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

CMP 30HX 6806
PRO V710 13129
+92.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.11 33.00
Recency 25 February 2021 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 158 Watt

CMP 30HX has 26.4% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 92.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 366.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 30HX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 30HX or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.