GeForce RTX 5090 vs B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated2
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.09
Power efficiencyno data12.23
ArchitectureBlackwell (2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGB100GB202
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2024 (1 year ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16896 ×221760
Core clock speed1665 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1837 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors104,000 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)1000 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate969.9 ×21,637
Floating-point processing power62.08 TFLOPS ×2104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs24 ×2176
TMUs528 ×2680
Tensor Cores528 ×2680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthSXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3eGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount96 GB ×232 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×2512 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.1 TB/s ×21.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA10.010.1
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 1000 Watt 575 Watt

B200 SXM 192 GB has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has 73.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between B200 SXM 192 GB and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 48 votes

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2271 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about B200 SXM 192 GB or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.