Radeon 780M vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated299
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2020 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate14.41139.2
Floating-point performance0.4612 gflops8.909 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Length295 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 54 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has 260% lower power consumption.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1324 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.