Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Arc Pro A30M

Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A60M
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Pro A30M with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

Arc Pro A30M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
14.85
+48.6%

Arc Pro A30M outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking353444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.97no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameDG2-128Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 August 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate128.0no data
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+40%
25
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Arc Pro A30M and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro A30M is 40% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.85 9.99
Recency 8 August 2022 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm

Arc Pro A30M has a 48.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
vs
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
vs
M3000M Quadro M3000M
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
vs
H800 SXM5 H800 SXM5
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
vs
RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Max-Q
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
vs
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
UHD Graphics 24EU UHD Graphics 24EU
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
UHD Graphics 32EU UHD Graphics 32EU
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 Iris Pro Graphics 580
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
R6 M340DX R6 M340DX
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
7900 GX2 7900 GX2
Arc A310 Arc A310
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.