RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Arc Graphics 32EU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe2-LPG (2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameArrow LakeGB203
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2568960
Core clock speed300 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors17,800 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate31.20374.4
Floating-point processing power0.9984 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 October 2024 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Graphics 32EU has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 7.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 32EU and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 32EU is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 32EU
Arc Graphics 32EU
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 32EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 32EU or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.