Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Arc Graphics 140V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon RX Vega M GL, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140V
16 GB LPDDR5x
13.42
+33%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms RX Vega M GL by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.71
ArchitectureXe² (2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUPolaris 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81280
Core clock speedno data931 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data80.88
Floating-point processing powerno data2.588 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xHBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data1024 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 140V 13.42
+33%
RX Vega M GL 10.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5158
+33%
RX Vega M GL 3878

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
1440p20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Elden Ring 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Counter-Strike 2 37
+37%
27−30
−37%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Dota 2 44
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%
Elden Ring 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Fortnite 75−80
+28.8%
55−60
−28.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+26.9%
75−80
−26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
World of Tanks 170−180
+23.4%
140−150
−23.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+26.9%
75−80
−26.9%
Valorant 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Elden Ring 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
World of Tanks 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Dota 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Elden Ring 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Fortnite 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Valorant 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and RX Vega M GL compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 43% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 37% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 9 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.42 10.09
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.