Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Arc Graphics 140V

Place in the ranking	384	447
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	10.74
Architecture	Xe² (2025)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Lunar Lake iGPU	Polaris 22
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	no data	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	1280
Core clock speed	no data	931 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	1011 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	3 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	80.88
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.588 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

no data

IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	1024 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	179.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 140V 13.43
+32.7%

RX Vega M GL 10.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5163
+32.7%

RX Vega M GL 3891

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40 +33.3%	30−35 −33.3%
1440p	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

45
+50%

30−33

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Counter-Strike 2	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Valorant	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Dota 2	44 +22.2%	35−40 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Fortnite	75−80 +28.8%	55−60 −28.8%
Forza Horizon 4	65 +44.4%	45−50 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	43 +19.4%	35−40 −19.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +26.9%	75−80 −26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Valorant	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
World of Tanks	180−190 +24.1%	140−150 −24.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Counter-Strike 2	25 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +42.5%	40−45 −42.5%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +26.9%	75−80 −26.9%
Valorant	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
World of Tanks	95−100 +35.7%	70−75 −35.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Counter-Strike 2	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Valorant	30−35 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Dota 2	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Fortnite	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Valorant	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%