Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking428not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUVega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84096
Core clock speedno data1156 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data319.2
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xHBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2024 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 56 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.