Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Arc Graphics 140T
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 393 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 16 |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x-8533 |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 30 October 2024 |
Arc Graphics 140T has an age advantage of 2 months.
We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140T and M4 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
