GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs Arc Graphics 130V

Place in the ranking	415	976
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	2.17
Architecture	Xe² (2025)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Lunar Lake iGPU	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	no data	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7	384
Core clock speed	no data	950 MHz
Boost clock speed	1850 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	3 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	30.40
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR5x	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

32
+700%

4−5

−700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

+720%

5−6
−720%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%
Counter-Strike 2	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +689%	9−10 −689%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +725%	4−5 −725%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Valorant	45−50 +683%	6−7 −683%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%
Counter-Strike 2	28 +833%	3−4 −833%
Dota 2	41 +720%	5−6 −720%
Far Cry 5	28 +833%	3−4 −833%
Fortnite	65−70 +656%	9−10 −656%
Forza Horizon 4	58 +729%	7−8 −729%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +760%	5−6 −760%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +725%	4−5 −725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +790%	10−11 −790%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +800%	4−5 −800%
Valorant	45−50 +683%	6−7 −683%
World of Tanks	160−170 +681%	21−24 −681%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%
Counter-Strike 2	25 +733%	3−4 −733%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +667%	6−7 −667%
Forza Horizon 4	48 +700%	6−7 −700%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +790%	10−11 −790%
Valorant	45−50 +683%	6−7 −683%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Dota 2	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
World of Tanks	80−85 +740%	10−11 −740%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +667%	3−4 −667%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +800%	3−4 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Valorant	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5	0−1
Dota 2	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +775%	4−5 −775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Fortnite	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Valorant	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and GTX 660M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

Arc Graphics 130V is 700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.48	1.52
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	3 nm	28 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 655.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.