GeForce MX450 vs Arc Graphics 130T

Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V
VS
MX450 MX450 12W MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps MX450 N18S-G5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130T
2025
15.20
+65.9%

Arc Graphics 130T outperforms MX450 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.33
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7896
Core clock speedno data1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data100.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.226 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data10000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64.03 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130T 15.20
+65.9%
GeForce MX450 9.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130T 6224
+65.9%
GeForce MX450 3751

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+60.7%
28
−60.7%
1440p24−27
+50%
16
−50%
4K40−45
+60%
25
−60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−3.5%
88
+3.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
32
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+32.7%
49
−32.7%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+26.9%
67
−26.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+45.5%
22
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+50%
34
−50%
Fortnite 85−90
+39.3%
61
−39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+41.2%
34
−41.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+69.7%
30−35
−69.7%
Valorant 120−130
+38.2%
85−90
−38.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+71.1%
38
−71.1%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+204%
28
−204%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+44.6%
130−140
−44.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+146%
13
−146%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+75.9%
29
−75.9%
Fortnite 85−90
+118%
39
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+84.6%
26
−84.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+50%
38
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+220%
10
−220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+69.7%
30−35
−69.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+24.2%
33
−24.2%
Valorant 120−130
+38.2%
85−90
−38.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+117%
30
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+300%
8
−300%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+88.9%
27
−88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+69.7%
30−35
−69.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+105%
20
−105%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+240%
25
−240%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+60%
70−75
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+118%
11
−118%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Valorant 150−160
+50.5%
100−110
−50.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.5%
22
−95.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+70%
20
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+68.2%
21−24
−68.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Valorant 80−85
+75%
45−50
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 88
+0%
88
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 81
+0%
81
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 32
+0%
32
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130T and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is 61% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 130T is 50% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 130T is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 450% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 4% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 58 tests (88%)
  • GeForce MX450 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.20 9.16
Recency 6 January 2025 1 August 2020

Arc Graphics 130T has a 65.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Arc Graphics 130T is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
RX 9070 GRE RX 9070 GRE
vs
RX 9070 9070
GTX 295 GTX 295
vs
Radeon 8060S 8060S
RTX 3060 Max-Q 3060 Max-Q
vs
GTX 970M SLI 970M SLI
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 3070 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 880M 880M
Iris Pro Graphics P580 Iris Pro Graphics P580
vs
GTX 965M GTX 965M
ATI HD 5850 HD 5850
vs
FirePro M6100 M6100
HD 8950 OEM HD 8950 OEM
vs
GTX 860M GTX 860M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1386 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or GeForce MX450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.