GRID K500 vs Arc Graphics 130T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking392not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71536 ×2
Core clock speedno data745 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data95.36 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 2 July 2014

Arc Graphics 130T has an age advantage of 10 years.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 130T and GRID K500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130T is a notebook graphics card while GRID K500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 37 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or GRID K500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.