Arc Pro B60 vs Arc A770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770M with Arc Pro B60, including specs and performance data.

Arc A770M
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
26.80

Pro B60 outperforms A770M by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking227197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.79
Power efficiency18.0011.92
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512BMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1650 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate524.8384.0
Floating-point processing power16.79 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs12816
TMUs256160
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores3220
L1 Cache6 MBno data
L2 Cache16 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A770M 26.80
Arc Pro B60 29.58
+10.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11850
Samples: 145
Arc Pro B60 13079
+10.4%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%
1440p53
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
4K37
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.54
1440pno data9.07
4Kno data12.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−4.3%
170−180
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
−6.2%
120−130
+6.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−4.3%
170−180
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Far Cry 5 106
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%
Fortnite 130−140
−4.5%
140−150
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−6.2%
120−130
+6.2%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 53
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
Valorant 180−190
−7.5%
200−210
+7.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−4.3%
170−180
+4.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−10.3%
300−310
+10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
Dota 2 130−140
−6.1%
140−150
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 99
−1%
100−105
+1%
Fortnite 130−140
−4.5%
140−150
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−6.2%
120−130
+6.2%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
−4.7%
90−95
+4.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 93
−7.5%
100−105
+7.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
−9.8%
190−200
+9.8%
Valorant 180−190
−7.5%
200−210
+7.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%
Dota 2 130−140
−6.1%
140−150
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−6.2%
120−130
+6.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Valorant 180−190
−7.5%
200−210
+7.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
−4.5%
140−150
+4.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 79
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−8.9%
220−230
+8.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 57
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 220−230
−7.6%
240−250
+7.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
−9%
85−90
+9%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Far Cry 5 81
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−5.3%
80−85
+5.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
−5.6%
75−80
+5.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Valorant 170−180
−9.8%
190−200
+9.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Dota 2 90−95
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

This is how Arc A770M and Arc Pro B60 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B60 is 6% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B60 is 4% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Pro B60 is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.80 29.58
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 200 Watt

Arc A770M has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has a 10.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770M is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 93 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A770M or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.