Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Arc A750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

Arc A750
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
31.30
+345%

Arc A750 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking177554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.84no data
Power efficiency9.6024.25
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)no data
GPU code nameDG2-512no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584768
Core clock speed2050 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2400 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate537.6no data
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112no data
TMUs224no data
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0no data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 31.30
+345%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 7.03

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A750 37288
+825%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 4033

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A750 29667
+698%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 3717

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A750 130715
+368%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 27960

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+414%
21
−414%
1440p58
+383%
12−14
−383%
4K35
+400%
7−8
−400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68no data
1440p4.98no data
4K8.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+417%
12−14
−417%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90
+400%
18−20
−400%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+411%
18−20
−411%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+350%
24−27
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+349%
45−50
−349%
Hitman 3 90−95
+348%
21−24
−348%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+409%
35−40
−409%
Metro Exodus 144
+380%
30−33
−380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+371%
21−24
−371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+371%
35−40
−371%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 106
+405%
21−24
−405%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+375%
16−18
−375%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+411%
18−20
−411%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+350%
24−27
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+349%
45−50
−349%
Hitman 3 90−95
+348%
21−24
−348%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+409%
35−40
−409%
Metro Exodus 143
+377%
30−33
−377%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+371%
21−24
−371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 239
+378%
50−55
−378%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+406%
18−20
−406%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+350%
10−11
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+393%
14−16
−393%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+411%
18−20
−411%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+400%
18−20
−400%
Hitman 3 90−95
+348%
21−24
−348%
Horizon Zero Dawn 113
+371%
24−27
−371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+398%
40−45
−398%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+393%
14−16
−393%
Watch Dogs: Legion 63
+350%
14−16
−350%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+371%
21−24
−371%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+378%
18−20
−378%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+375%
8−9
−375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
+350%
12−14
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+378%
50−55
−378%
Hitman 3 55−60
+383%
12−14
−383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+411%
18−20
−411%
Metro Exodus 86
+378%
18−20
−378%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 145
+383%
30−33
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+375%
12−14
−375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+353%
45−50
−353%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Hitman 3 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+385%
40−45
−385%
Metro Exodus 80
+400%
16−18
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+393%
14−16
−393%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+367%
6−7
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+408%
12−14
−408%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+367%
18−20
−367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+400%
6−7
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%

This is how Arc A750 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 414% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 383% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.30 7.03
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 20 Watt

Arc A750 has a 345.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 1025% lower power consumption.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A750 is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A750
Arc A750
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 831 vote

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.