ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs Arc A730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking265not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.54no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameDG2-512R350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2022 (4 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,700 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate393.63.040
Floating-point processing power12.6 TFLOPSno data
ROPs968
TMUs1928
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data
L1 Cache4.5 MBno data
L2 Cache12 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 47 Watt

Arc A730M has a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 70.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A730M and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 115 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A730M or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.