RTX PRO 6000 vs Arc A730M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-512GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307224064
Core clock speed1100 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate393.61,810
Floating-point processing power12.6 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs96176
TMUs192752
Tensor Cores384752
Ray Tracing Cores24188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount12 GB96 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 600 Watt

Arc A730M has 650% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc A730M and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 111 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A730M or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.