Riva TNT2 vs Arc A380

Place in the ranking	386	1589
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	38.39	no data
Power efficiency	15.43	no data
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code name	DG2-128	NV5
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	14 June 2022 (3 years ago)	12 October 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	no data
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	125 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	15 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	131.2	0.25
Floating-point processing power	4.198 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	2
TMUs	64	2
Tensor Cores	128	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	8	no data
L2 Cache	4 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	AGP 4x
Length	222 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	SDR
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 MB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1937 MHz	150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	186.0 GB/s	2.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	1x VGA
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	6.0
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A380 15.08
+150700%

Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A380 6305
+210067%

Samples: 557

Riva TNT2 3
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.17

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	183	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	41	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	23	0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	65−70	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	122	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	33	0−1
Far Cry 5	62	0−1
Fortnite	85−90	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	76	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	72	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	18	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60	0−1
Valorant	120−130	0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	65−70	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	57	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	29	0−1
Far Cry 5	57	0−1
Fortnite	85−90	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	72	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	64	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	33	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	13	0−1
Metro Exodus	40	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	66	0−1
Valorant	120−130	0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	65−70	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	26	0−1
Far Cry 5	52	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	57	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	7	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34	0−1
Valorant	120−130	0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

85−90

0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	30−33	0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	110−120	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27	0−1
Metro Exodus	18−20	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150	0−1
Valorant	150−160	0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Far Cry 5	30−35	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	16−18	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

30−35

0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10	0−1
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	0−1
Valorant	85−90	0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16	0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite

14−16

0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.08	0.01
Recency	14 June 2022	12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 MB
Chip lithography	6 nm	250 nm

Arc A380 has a 150700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 22 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.