H100 SXM5 80 GB vs Arc A370M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.95no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128GH100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416896
Core clock speed300 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz1980 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate99.201,045
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs64528
Tensor Coresno data528
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB80 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1,681 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-9.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 700 Watt

Arc A370M has 1900% lower power consumption.

H100 SXM5 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc A370M and H100 SXM5 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while H100 SXM5 80 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80 GB
H100 SXM5 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 186 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A370M or H100 SXM5 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.