Tesla K10 vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.22no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDG2-128GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)1 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate55.2095.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2432 ×2
TMUs48128 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores6no data
L1 Cache1.1 MB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 1 May 2012
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Tesla K10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K10 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
NVIDIA Tesla K10
Tesla K10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 76 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 15 votes

Rate Tesla K10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A350M or Tesla K10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.