GeForce GT 610 vs Arc A350M

Place in the ranking	357	1144
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	40.18	1.91
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	DG2-128	GF119
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	2 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$39.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	48
Core clock speed	300 MHz	810 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	102 °C
Texture fill rate	55.20	6.480
Floating-point processing power	1.766 TFLOPS	0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	4
TMUs	48	8
Ray Tracing Cores	6	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1024 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.66
+1710%

GT 610 0.81

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A350M 7147
+1832%

GT 610 370

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35 +3400%	1−2 −3400%
1440p	17	0−1
4K	9	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

39.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27
+2600%

1−2

−2600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 +3400%	1−2 −3400%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +1760%	5−6 −1760%
Hitman 3	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +2300%	2−3 −2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +1800%	4−5 −1800%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +2200%	2−3 −2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	16	0−1
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +1760%	5−6 −1760%
Hitman 3	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +2300%	2−3 −2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 +2550%	2−3 −2550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +1800%	4−5 −1800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	12	0−1
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +1760%	5−6 −1760%
Hitman 3	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 +2150%	2−3 −2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +1800%	4−5 −1800%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+1850%

2−3

−1850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	0−1
Far Cry 5	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +1725%	4−5 −1725%
Hitman 3	16−18	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +2100%	4−5 −2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+2200%

1−2

−2200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11	0−1
Hitman 3	10−11	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +2267%	3−4 −2267%
Metro Exodus	14−16	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

0−1

This is how Arc A350M and GT 610 compete in popular games:

Arc A350M is 3400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.66	0.81
Recency	30 March 2022	2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1024 MB
Chip lithography	6 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	29 Watt

Arc A350M has a 1709.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 16% lower power consumption.

The Arc A350M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 610 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook card while GeForce GT 610 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.