Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Iris Pro Graphics P580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8-Core iGPU outperforms Pro Graphics P580 by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 353 | 675 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 24.61 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Skylake GT4e |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 September 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 75.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.21 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 9 |
| TMUs | no data | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 64 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35
+289%
| 9−10
−289%
|
| 1440p | 17
+325%
| 4−5
−325%
|
| 4K | 14
+367%
| 3−4
−367%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 111
+405%
|
21−24
−405%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+220%
|
10−11
−220%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+265%
|
20−22
−265%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85
+286%
|
21−24
−286%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+160%
|
14−16
−160%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+224%
|
27−30
−224%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+204%
|
21−24
−204%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+315%
|
12−14
−315%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 26
+160%
|
10−11
−160%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+242%
|
18−20
−242%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+121%
|
60−65
−121%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+265%
|
20−22
−265%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42
+90.9%
|
21−24
−90.9%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+158%
|
80−85
−158%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
+140%
|
14−16
−140%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+224%
|
27−30
−224%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+204%
|
21−24
−204%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+315%
|
12−14
−315%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 25
+56.3%
|
16−18
−56.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 19
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Metro Exodus | 28
+211%
|
9−10
−211%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+242%
|
18−20
−242%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48
+243%
|
14−16
−243%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+121%
|
60−65
−121%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+265%
|
20−22
−265%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
+127%
|
14−16
−127%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+204%
|
21−24
−204%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+242%
|
18−20
−242%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+121%
|
60−65
−121%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 90−95
+224%
|
27−30
−224%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+241%
|
35−40
−241%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+369%
|
35−40
−369%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+215%
|
50−55
−215%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+880%
|
5−6
−880%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 32
+256%
|
9−10
−256%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+250%
|
12−14
−250%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+271%
|
7−8
−271%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+290%
|
10−11
−290%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−88.9%
|
16−18
+88.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+304%
|
24−27
−304%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
+240%
|
5−6
−240%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compete in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 289% faster in 1080p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 325% faster in 1440p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 367% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 2400% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 89% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU performs better in 57 tests (93%)
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 performs better in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.00 | 4.57 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 1 September 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 250.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
