GeForce FX Go 5200 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce FX Go 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 79500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 311 | 1501 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | no data |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | NV31M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 March 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 5 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 150 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | DDR |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36 | -0−1 |
| 1440p | 17 | -0−1 |
| 4K | 14 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 53
+5200%
|
1−2
−5200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 111 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 40
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 90−95 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+3450%
|
2−3
−3450%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+983%
|
6−7
−983%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+458%
|
24−27
−458%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 28
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+2322%
|
9−10
−2322%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 90−95 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+3450%
|
2−3
−3450%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 25 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 28 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+983%
|
6−7
−983%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48
+1500%
|
3−4
−1500%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+458%
|
24−27
−458%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+3450%
|
2−3
−3450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+983%
|
6−7
−983%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+458%
|
24−27
−458%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 90−95 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 160−170 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 32 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 95−100
+9600%
|
1−2
−9600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 9600% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the FX Go 5200 is 67% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is ahead in 23 tests (88%)
- FX Go 5200 is ahead in 1 test (4%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.92 | 0.02 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 1 March 2003 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 150 nm |
Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 79500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
