GeForce FX Go 5200 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and GeForce FX Go 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
17.82
+89000%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 89000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3031493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)no data
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUNV31M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores85
Core clock speedno data1 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm150 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data300 MHz
Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DDR

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36-0−1
1440p20-0−1
4K15-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26
+189%
9−10
−189%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 23
+156%
9−10
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
Metro Exodus 40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Valorant 75−80 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 23
+156%
9−10
−156%
Dota 2 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 34
+580%
5−6
−580%
Fortnite 100−105 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 59
+1080%
5−6
−1080%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 25 0−1
Metro Exodus 29 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+3075%
4−5
−3075%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
Valorant 75−80 0−1
World of Tanks 220−230
+2675%
8−9
−2675%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1180%
5−6
−1180%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+820%
5−6
−820%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+3075%
4−5
−3075%
Valorant 75−80 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50
+1125%
4−5
−1125%
Forza Horizon 4 30 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Valorant 45−50
+1075%
4−5
−1075%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Dota 2 9
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 15 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 3075% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the FX Go 5200 is 67% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is ahead in 20 tests (67%)
  • FX Go 5200 is ahead in 3 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.82 0.02
Recency 14 December 2023 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 5 nm 150 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 89000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 53 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.