RTX A4500 Mobile vs Arc 7-Core iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 7-Core iGPU with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Arc 7-Core iGPU
2023
15.62

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms 7-Core iGPU by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking375120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.76
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date14 December 2023 (2 years ago)22 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores75888
Core clock speedno data930 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data140 Watt
Texture fill rateno data276.0
Floating-point processing powerno data17.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache1.3 MB5.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−143%
85−90
+143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90
−144%
220−230
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−194%
90−95
+194%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
−203%
90−95
+203%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%
Counter-Strike 2 58
−279%
220−230
+279%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−248%
90−95
+248%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
−89.1%
120−130
+89.1%
Far Cry 5 39
−228%
120−130
+228%
Fortnite 85−90
−95.5%
170−180
+95.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−133%
150−160
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
−248%
90−95
+248%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−164%
150−160
+164%
Valorant 120−130
−80.5%
230−240
+80.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%
Counter-Strike 2 31
−610%
220−230
+610%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−34.8%
270−280
+34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−309%
90−95
+309%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
−89.1%
120−130
+89.1%
Far Cry 5 36
−256%
120−130
+256%
Fortnite 85−90
−95.5%
170−180
+95.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−133%
150−160
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−450%
130−140
+450%
Hogwarts Legacy 17
−453%
90−95
+453%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−191%
95−100
+191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−164%
150−160
+164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−182%
140−150
+182%
Valorant 120−130
−80.5%
230−240
+80.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
−98.5%
130−140
+98.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−327%
90−95
+327%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
−89.1%
120−130
+89.1%
Far Cry 5 35
−266%
120−130
+266%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−133%
150−160
+133%
Hogwarts Legacy 13
−623%
90−95
+623%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−164%
150−160
+164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−526%
140−150
+526%
Valorant 120−130
−80.5%
230−240
+80.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
−95.5%
170−180
+95.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−229%
100−110
+229%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−140%
280−290
+140%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−219%
80−85
+219%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−195%
55−60
+195%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−13.6%
170−180
+13.6%
Valorant 150−160
−65.8%
260−270
+65.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
−127%
100−110
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
−191%
95−100
+191%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−177%
95−100
+177%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−195%
110−120
+195%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−176%
45−50
+176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−235%
75−80
+235%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−197%
100−110
+197%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−262%
45−50
+262%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−203%
85−90
+203%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−208%
35−40
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−191%
60−65
+191%
Valorant 85−90
−177%
240−250
+177%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−178%
60−65
+178%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−262%
45−50
+262%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−212%
50−55
+212%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−175%
75−80
+175%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−231%
50−55
+231%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how Arc 7-Core iGPU and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 143% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hogwarts Legacy, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 623% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile performs better in 66 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.62 39.66
Recency 14 December 2023 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

Arc 7-Core iGPU has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 153.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 7-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 7-Core iGPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Arc 7-Core iGPU
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 29 votes

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 44 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc 7-Core iGPU or RTX A4500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.