GeForce GTX 1630 vs Arc 7-Core iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 7-Core iGPU with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

Arc 7-Core iGPU
2023
17.25
+33.5%

Arc 7-Core iGPU outperforms GTX 1630 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking298363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.87
ArchitectureXe LPGTuring (2018−2021)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Current priceno data$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7512
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc 7-Core iGPU and GeForce GTX 1630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+36%
50−55
−36%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
+35%
40−45
−35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

This is how Arc 7-Core iGPU and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Core iGPU is 38% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.25 12.92
Recency 14 December 2023 28 June 2022
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm

The Arc 7-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 7-Core iGPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Arc 7-Core iGPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1163 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.