Radeon RX 470 vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
455 OEM 460 460 1024SP 470 470D 480

Contents

Share:
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
RX 470 RX 470

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52317
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.70
Power efficiencyno data12.42
Architectureno dataGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataEllesmere
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2026 (recently)4 August 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402048
Core clock speedno data926 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1206 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data154.4
Floating-point processing powerno data4.94 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data211.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+46.4%
69
−46.4%
1440p57
+50%
38
−50%
4K36
−2.8%
37
+2.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.59
1440pno data4.71
4Kno data4.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+0%
73
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+0%
70
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+0%
40
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 59
+0%
59
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU and RX 470 compete in popular games:

  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 46% faster in 1080p
  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX 470 is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Recency 3 March 2026 4 August 2016

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 9 years.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Radeon RX 470. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 470 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU
M5 Max 40-Core GPU
AMD Radeon RX 470
Radeon RX 470
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 470 Radeon RX 470
vs
R9 290 Radeon R9 290
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 480 Radeon RX 480
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 570 Mobile Radeon RX 570 Mobile
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 5 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5252 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Radeon RX 470, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.