Quadro M2200 vs Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M1000M M1200 M2000M M2200 M3000M M4000M M5000M M5500

Contents

Share:
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking52484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.35
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataGM206
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 March 2026 (less than a year ago)11 January 2017 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401024
Core clock speedno data695 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1036 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,940 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data66.30
Floating-point processing powerno data2.122 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5x-8533GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1377 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data88 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+149%
43
−149%
1440p60no data
4K38
+171%
14
−171%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 149% faster in 1080p
  • Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is 171% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Recency 3 March 2026 11 January 2017

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 9 years.

We couldn't decide between M5 Max 40-Core GPU and Quadro M2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
R9 M370X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU M5 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
GTX 1080 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 570 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 480 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 560 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 460 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro M1200 NVIDIA Quadro M1200
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro M620 NVIDIA Quadro M620
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro M520 NVIDIA Quadro M520
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
Pro WX 7100 AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
RX 580 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
vs
Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.8 607 votes

Rate M5 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 484 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M5 Max 40-Core GPU or Quadro M2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.