Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 vs Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 29 September 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x-8533 | no data |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 29 September 2025 |
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 has an age advantage of 10 months.
We couldn't decide between M4 Pro 16-Core GPU and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
