Arc Graphics 130V vs Apple M4 9-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated479
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataXe² (2024)
GPU code nameno dataLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data24 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97
Boost clock speedno data1850 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data3 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5X-7500LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Shared memoryno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12_2

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between M4 9-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 130V. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate M4 9-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 74 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M4 9-Core GPU or Arc Graphics 130V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.