Radeon 780M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated338
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Power efficiencyno data83.37
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameR100Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 July 2000 (24 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed166 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors30 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1139.2
Floating-point processing powerno data8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 July 2000 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200
All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1964 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.