Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated14
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data42.81
Power efficiencyno data16.27
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRV635Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)3 November 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1206144
Core clock speed722 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2498 MHz
Number of transistors378 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt355 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776959.2
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length232 mm287 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 355 Watt

ATI All-In-Wonder HD has 545% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and Radeon RX 7900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5183 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or Radeon RX 7900 XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.