Radeon RX 7400 vs ATI All-In-Wonder HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data49.75
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRV635Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2008 (17 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201792
Core clock speed722 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2300 MHz
Number of transistors378 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate5.776257.6
Floating-point processing power0.1733 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length232 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.01 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2008 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 43 Watt

RX 7400 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 27.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder HD and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder HD
All-In-Wonder HD
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder HD or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.