GeForce 8400M G vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.93
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV280G86
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (22 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors36 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0003.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed164 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.624 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 9 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

8400M G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 SE and GeForce 8400M G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8400M G is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 SE or GeForce 8400M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.