GeForce 8200M G vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)no data
GPU code nameRV280MCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (22 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed250 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors36 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Texture fill rate1.000no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed164 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth2.624 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.110
OpenGL1.4no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

8200M G has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 SE and GeForce 8200M G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 SE or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.