Radeon HD 7330M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV515Robson
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 December 2005 (19 years ago)7 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors107 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data5 Watt
Texture fill rate1.8004.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length249 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.04.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2005 7 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm

HD 7330M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 and Radeon HD 7330M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7330M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300
All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300
AMD Radeon HD 7330M
Radeon HD 7330M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 or Radeon HD 7330M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.