ATI Radeon X800 XT vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.33
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRage 4R423
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)1 December 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed134 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors8 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data54 Watt
Texture fill rate0.548.000
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed134 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.072 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.09.0b (9_2)
OpenGL1.22.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 1 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 250 nm 130 nm

ATI X800 XT has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 92.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra and Radeon X800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
ATI Radeon X800 XT
Radeon X800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra or Radeon X800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.