Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameRage 4Cedar Trail
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)1 November 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed90 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data400 MHz
Number of transistors8 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm32 nm
Texture fill rate0.36no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount16 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed90 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth720.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0no data
OpenGL1.2no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 250 nm 32 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 681.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PCI and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 164 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PCI or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.