GeForce RTX 5090 vs A10M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 6 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 36 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 24.93 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.44 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GA102 | GB202 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | February 2022 (3 years ago) | 30 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7168 | 21760 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 2017 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1635 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 28,300 million | 92,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 575 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 366.2 | 1,637 |
| Floating-point processing power | 23.44 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80 | 176 |
| TMUs | 224 | 680 |
| Tensor Cores | 224 | 680 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 170 |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB | 21.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 304 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1563 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 500.2 GB/s | 1.79 TB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 12.0 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 32 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 575 Watt |
A10M has 283.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A10M and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A10M is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
