Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs A10G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A10 PCIe A10G A10M A40 PCIe CMP 90HX Quadro RTX 8200 Quadro RTX A6000 A40 A4500 A5000 A5000-8Q A5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 GRE 16 GB 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared A10G with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, including specs and performance data.

A10G
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
32.52

9060 XT 16GB outperforms A10G by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
A10G A10G
RX 9060 XT 16GB RX 9060 XT 16GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.69no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4 (2025)
GPU code nameGA102no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)2 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores92162048
Core clock speed1320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1710 MHz2530 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate492.5no data
Floating-point processing power31.52 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L1 Cache9 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1563 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth600.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−78.9%
170
+78.9%
1440p40−45
−95%
78
+95%
4K24−27
−100%
48
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 270
+0%
270
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 248
+0%
248
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+0%
273
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 233
+0%
233
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how A10G and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 79% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 95% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.52 57.90
Recency 12 April 2021 2 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 78% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the A10G in performance tests.

Be aware that A10G is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA A10G
A10G
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

A10G A10G
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
RX 9060 XT 16GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
A10G A10G
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
A10G NVIDIA A10G
vs
RTX A5000-8Q RTX A5000-8Q
A10G NVIDIA A10G
vs
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT
A10G NVIDIA A10G
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
A10G NVIDIA A10G
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Graphics 130V
A10G NVIDIA A10G
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell
PG506-232 NVIDIA PG506 232
vs
RX 6950 XT RX 6950 XT
PG506-232 NVIDIA PG506 232
vs
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT
PG506-232 NVIDIA PG506 232
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
PG506-232 NVIDIA PG506 232
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
PG506-232 NVIDIA PG506 232
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 409 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A10G or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.