Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGA100Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69122304
Core clock speed1410 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1243 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate609.1179.0
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16032
TMUs432144
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount40 GB16 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 200 Watt

A100 SXM4 has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pro V7350X2, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon Pro V7350X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
Radeon Pro V7350X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V7350X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or Radeon Pro V7350X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.