RTX A1000 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data39.68
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 May 2019 (6 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed300 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20105.3
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2472
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.971.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2019 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G4 and RTX A1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G4 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G4 or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.